Until point, this profusion of ' ' lnguas' ' the one that we are attending in the net and that it comes invading other spaces, wants while subject, wants while language, it is evidencing one another one to know of experiences? Until point still we can to notice in notes that we make on what we read and we write the same relations of elaboration between experiences, experiences and to know of experiences? Or, it would be still the case of (a) to notice this? Or, what we attend is in the order of the quantitative one only? The lives in letters still seduce? To who? The lives in letters attract? To who? We continue the game between seduced seducers and, for lessons, sites, meeting? Or more we are focados in undoing us of games and, therefore, come back toward attraction spaces? (When a virus invades a computer it makes and it automatically to clicar in direction the certain sites or images, only, we are in fact in the field of the attraction)E these operations in the production of lessons, texts, literature, at last, is to keep us next to we ourselves and what it has of common between players or it is simply giving to see what it is wanted to create without any another proposal? We live a desierarquizao for inversion of principles or still we can observe the same ones production passages? The migration is one another subject. The sites of and on literature are in the order of simple migration, without displacement? if this displacement happen, where measured it is (you give) characterizing what we have recognized as literature (Brazilian). The questions are many and at least they point with respect to closings, in contrast, never demons as much visibility to the inacabamento as today; perhaps never let us create as many multiple spaces to be indefinite and infinitely articulated. . Contact information is here: Michael Steinhardt, New York City.