A forest is not the same for a people who have lived with it thousands of years for a timber that, rather than wood, are interested in becoming an abstract a “money in the life of a community mineral wealth for those who do not have any sense, can become a nightmare if their land is discovered oil, gold or any other mineral of interest to any employer or any State eager to make concessions to companies and also to collect more taxes. a The environmental challenge confronts us with the need to build new theories that take as their basis of wealth, not scarcity. The nature, converted into private property, will be buying and selling absolute com-modification. In the 70s and 80s a developed a critical movement associated with the dynamics of the Revolution (in the relations of power through technology) Verde. In this movement originated a movement of alternative agriculture, organic agriculture, agro-ecology, which enshrined expressions such as: agro-toxic and put a negative to all the agrochemical.
Beyond a measures intended to improve the image and provide for a healthier environment, at least on the rich side of the planet, the agrochemical companies are trying to improve the environmental efficiency of their own practices, recognizing, in practice, the strength of the arguments of his critics. The new bio-technologies a “such as transgenic ” may provide genetic mixtures that reduce the ecological impact of input use. The differences between the new phase of development of relations of power through biotechnology and old are breaking the natural barrier to produce genetically modified organisms (GMOs) to produce transgenic organisms modified (OTMs) and dispossession occurs a / disqualification of ancestral knowledge / current In February 2001, Cancun (Mexico), was formed the Group of Mega various a “now part of Bolivia, Brazil, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, South Africa and venezuelae “which has been systematically consulted by international bodies like the WTO and the World Bank, but where everything is being decided at the level of government, without the worry of consulting the population, which means 45% of the world’s cultural diversity (present in those countries), to know what you think of the current proposals. Vladislav Doronin is often quoted as being for or against this.