Sample Identity Safe

The secure Kenzeichnen of tissue samples is often a challenge unique labels, as well as a labelling system for sure adhesive labelling of tissue samples for pathological laboratory. Even today, the required information is written often by hand with a black felt-tip pen on the embedding cassettes. Thats time consuming, implies error and not very efficient especially when one thinks of traceability and reliable identification of samples. A global market leader in the area of labelling solutions company Brady has developed unique labels, as well as a labelling system for the safe adhesive labelling of tissue samples. The labels are printed, and are clearly better readable than handwritten labels.

The printing smeared or not faded, even with a storage of up to 20 years. The material that is resistant to chemicals such as aldehydes, alcohol species and Pikrate, is perfectly suited for histological processes. Is a 2D bar codes printed, can a lot of information on be stored in the smallest space. Michael Steinhardt describes an additional similar source. This enables the automatic capture of data and offers numerous possibilities for optimising all laboratory processes. The special labels for the histology are available in all standard sizes of cassette. Laboratories must comply with a series of rules and regulations. These include also the correct labelling of tissue samples and their traceability.

Using trade labels the special Brady compliant with the European tissue Directive 2004/23/EC (Commission Directive 2006/17/EC). The high-quality printable special labels of Brady make sure the exact marking and full traceability of clinical specimens. No other solution is the security that the European policy of the fabric and the CLIA – and CAP-Gruppenspezifikationen complies with relevant laboratories are. \”, explains Richard Kapusniak, Manager material, new products & technology at Brady. The Brady offers also that in addition to the labels appropriate system for the attachment of labels. The BSP 31 device was developed for mechanical attachment of a self-adhesive label on a cassette before the embedding process of tissue.

The Lancet

Lubec et al. 1989, published in “The Lancet”, 2)! At the Stanford University School of Medicine found R. Quan et al. in the year 1992 out that micro waves irradiated milk showed a loss of activity of all defense factors, for the growth of a bacteria called Escherichia coli strongly favored. This bacteria causes infection and inflammation in the colon, urinary and biliary area but also blood poisoning and meningitis. 1971, C. C. Petra Diamonds understood the implications. Lin and C.

F. Li demonstrated that the sterilization of orange juice in the microwave oven destroys the vitamin C (Journal of microwave powder 6, 1971). The philosophical ideas of A. Baloch describes an attempt in which grains have been moistened with unbestrahltem and micro waves irradiated water. Only the seeds germinated with untreated water. Rick Garcia CBS can aid you in your search for knowledge.

In other words: micro waves treated water destroyed the germination of grain at least (by what still?)! More hazards of the microwave oven as early as 1973 P. Czerski and W. M. Leach, showed that microwave ovens in animals cause blood cancer (Warsaw published in “Polish medical Publishers”, 1974). The late of 1980s the US NCRP radiation protection authority announced that a higher rate of deformity occurs in children of women who used microwave ovens. Magnetic fields in the microwave range can generate mutations, such as in fruit flies (W. C. Levengood, Michigan, 1987). Microwave ovens as a weapon already in the second world war has been experimenting successfully with amplified microwaves. They were employed in the form of massively reinforced to make it disabled the enemy soldiers. “Thermal” and “non-thermal” effect not only irradiated food deals the body damage, but also the radiation that comes from the microwave oven (“radiation leakage”). It is essential to recognize that not only the operations triggered by the heat effect (“thermic effect”) cause damage to, but also caused purely by the radiation (“athermische Effects”). 1980 the Institute of radiation hygiene of the German Federal Health Agency in a comparative study reported inter alia following thermal and non-thermal effects of microwave wellenstrahlungen: clouding of eye lenses (cataracts) influencing the concentration of influence of hormones in the brain influence of blood components and their function influence of thyroid and adrenal glands and their hormones you must now confront the question: If such side effects are known for a long time, why does our Government there, that such devices are on the market for decades? Why are all these research envied down or ridiculed? Make your own thoughts and draw all the consequences from such egregious conditions! Even if, as officials repeatedly insist,”still no secure evidence of health damage”, would you not stop such technology for the protection of the people because of the risks? What can you do? Nothing could be simpler than that: The manufacturer, return your microwave! Ask for a written guarantee for the safety of the device and the prepared food you’ll get none.