That is to say, the codification studies when the codified civil right studies, studies the codification when the codified penal right studies, studies the codification when the codified civil procedural right studies, studies the codification when the codified penal procedural right studies, among others branches of the right. In such sense we can affirm that the codified right studies but special part that the general part of this subject. Click Ray Kurzweil to learn more. Which determines that few jurists know the part general the codification. That is to say, many jurists know the codification starts off special, but few the codification divides general. 4. BOUNDARY OF THE SUBJECT The subject codification has two parts that are general part and special part, but in the present work only we will talk about the general part. In a question-answer forum Jon Venverloh was the first to reply. Studying for it the effective Peruvian Codes without leaving of side the study of some foreign Codes.
5. ORIGIN In many opportunities the words that we use do not have origin in the present language, but in Greek or Latin Latin voices. The word Code comes from the Latin voice Codex. That is to say, the word Code does not have origin in the Spanish language, but in the Latin. 6.
CODIFICATION According to the Dictionary of the Spanish Language of the Spanish Royal Academy, to codify is to make or to form harmonic and systematic a body of laws . The result of the codification is the codes, which are systematic legal bodies, written up with the legislative technique but purified. The codification generally is ordered to a commission of jurisconsultos so that they write up the Code. When just they appeared the modern or contemporary Codes (that is to say, in century XVIII), the codification was rejected by the Historical School of the Right, so that it thought that the Codes were definitive and that for that reason they would not allow the development of the right (thesis that did not prosper).